首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative study of the two large flares from SGR1900+14 with \ud the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
【2h】

Comparative study of the two large flares from SGR1900+14 with \ud the BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor

机译:sGR1900 + 14两种大型照明弹的比较研究 BepposaX伽马射线爆破监视器

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We report on spectral and temporal results of the 40-700 keV observations, obtained with the Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GRBM) on board BeppoSAX, of the two large flares from the Soft Gamma-ray Repeater SGR 1900+14 occurred on August 27, 1998 and April 18, 2001. From their intensity, fluence and duration, the first one was classified as ``giant'' and the second as ``intermediate''.The spectral results have been obtained with an improved response function of the GRBM. We find that the two events have similar spectral properties, but different temporal properties. The major difference concerns the time profiles of the light curves, whereas the lack of evidence in the 2001 flare for the erratic time variability found at high frequencies (10-1000 Hz) in the 1998 flare could be ascribed to lower counting statistics. We discuss these results in the light of the magnetar model proposed for SGR sources.
机译:我们报告了使用BeppoSAX上的伽玛射线爆裂监测仪(GRBM)获得的40-700 keV观测的光谱和时间结果,这些结果是8月27日发生的来自软伽玛射线中继器SGR 1900 + 14的两个大火炬,1998年和2001年4月18日。根据它们的强度,通量和持续时间,第一个分类为“巨人”,第二个分类为“中级”。 GRBM。我们发现这两个事件具有相似的光谱特性,但具有不同的时间特性。主要区别在于光曲线的时间分布,而在2001年耀斑中缺乏有关1998年耀斑在高频(10-1000 Hz)上发现的不稳定时间变化的证据,可能归因于较低的计数统计量。我们根据为SGR源提出的电磁模型讨论这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号